N17bn Gate saga: How much did Obasa really spend?
Obasa
Published By: Kazeem Ugbodaga
By Kazeem Ugbodaga
The allegations of Speaker Mudashiru Obasa spending N17 billion on constructing a gate for the Lagos State House of Assembly have sparked intense public debate, with critics demanding transparency and accountability. However, Obasa’s strong rebuttal raises several points worthy of deeper analysis.
A group calling itself the Lagos State Anti-Corruption Coalition claimed that the Assembly allocated N17 billion for the construction of a gate. This figure, if accurate, would account for a substantial percentage of the Assembly’s annual allocation. The group also alleged that N200 million was spent on a thanksgiving service, further amplifying public suspicion.
Obasa dismissed the claims as “spurious and absurd,” stating that they were politically motivated ahead of the 2027 elections. He questioned the logic of such an expense, saying: “How much is the allocation of the Assembly in the whole year that we will decide to spend N17 billion on a gate?”
The Speaker categorically denied embarking on such a project or being reckless with Assembly funds. He also labelled the allegations of a connection with the EFCC Chairman, Ola Olukoyede, as baseless.
Key Questions Arising
What is the budget for the Assembly?
Obasa suggests that N17 billion far exceeds the Assembly’s annual allocation, implying that such an expenditure would be financially impossible. Yet, without specific budgetary figures, the public cannot independently verify this claim.
- N17bn Gate scandal: Obasa breaks silence, blames 2027 politics for allegation
- Obasa hits back at detractors: ‘I am qualified to become Lagos Governor’
- Lagos Assembly Speaker presents vehicles to senior staff
What does N17 billion represent?
To put this amount into perspective, N17 billion could fund multiple large-scale infrastructure projects or significantly improve public services. If spent on a gate, this would represent gross fiscal irresponsibility.
Where is the Evidence?
Neither the group nor Obasa has provided tangible evidence to substantiate or refute the allegations. Obasa’s challenge to the group to investigate and produce proof, including CCTV footage of his alleged visit to the National Assembly, shifts the burden of proof back to the accusers.
The role of Political Motivation
Obasa’s assertion that the allegations are tied to political fears over the 2027 elections introduces another dimension. If true, it suggests that the claims may be a strategic attempt to tarnish his reputation.
The critical question remains unanswered: How much, if anything, did the Lagos State House of Assembly spend on the gate? Transparency is essential to dispel public doubts. Releasing detailed financial records of the Assembly’s expenditures could clarify the issue. Without such evidence, the allegations will linger, casting a shadow over the Assembly’s reputation and Speaker Obasa’s leadership.
Accountability should not only be demanded of the accused but also of those making the allegations. Both sides must substantiate their claims with credible evidence to enable the public to draw informed conclusions.
